9X Markets Review 2026: License Status, Rating, Complaints, and Key Risk Signals
9X Markets review 2026: WikiFX score 1.98/10, no forex license, limited UAE advisory license, Mauritius FSC record, and complaints centered in Pakistan and India.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:Najm Capital shows a low WikiFX score, limited licence scope, and visible UAE-facing activity without clear local brokerage permission.

Najm Capital is a relatively new broker brand that says it offers trading in forex, metals, commodities, and stocksthrough MetaTrader 5 and its own trading platform. Public-facing materials show the brand was established in 2025 and registered in Saint Lucia. The platform also advertises four account types and several common payment channels for deposits and withdrawals.
Najm Capitals website presents four account categories with different minimum deposit thresholds. Based on the account page, these include entry-level and higher-tier options ranging from lower starting deposits to premium-style accounts.

The platform also displays several payment methods, including Mastercard, Visa, bank transfer, Neteller, and Skrill. The payment page shows a minimum deposit of 100 and a minimum withdrawal of 25, with no commission listed for deposits or withdrawals on those methods.

On the product side, Najm Capital markets itself as a broker covering several major asset classes, while also promoting both MT5 and a proprietary trading interface.
On WikiFX, Najm Capital is shown with a score of 1.72/10, alongside a clear Not Regulated label. The profile also shows that the regulation score is 0, while only software and business receive points in the scoring breakdown.

A more important detail appears in the licence information shown on WikiFX. The broker is linked to an FSC Mauritiuslicence, but the licence notice shown in the screenshot states that it does not cover forex-related business and does not authorise forex trading.

That point matters because Najm Capital openly markets forex as one of its trading products. If the licence on record does not cover forex activity, then the brokers forex offering is, in practical terms, not supported by a forex trading licence.
So while there is a licence reference attached to the brand, the issue is not simply whether a licence exists somewhere in the structure. The issue is that the scope shown does not match the forex business being promoted on the platform.
WikiFXs influence map shows that Najm Capital has visible activity in the United Arab Emirates, indicating that the brand is actively reaching users in that market.

That makes the local licensing question more relevant. In the UAE, a broker facing mainland clients generally cannot be treated as locally operable simply because it is registered offshore.
In broad terms, a Category 5 licence in the UAE is usually associated with introduction and promotion activity. It can allow a firm to market financial services locally under a limited structure, but it does not amount to full local brokerage operations. A Category 1 licence, by contrast, is the more substantial authorisation associated with a fuller brokerage model, including core dealing functions and direct client-facing operations under the local regulatory framework.
Based on the materials provided here, Najm Capital does not hold either a UAE Category 5 or Category 1 licence. That means its UAE-facing presence appears to exist without the local brokerage permissions that would normally matter for this type of market activity.
A further point that stands out is the website structure.
During the review, it was found that a site branded as 1FX appears to use the same template layout as Najm Capital. The page structure, visual arrangement, and design flow look highly similar.

This does not by itself prove a direct relationship, nor does it automatically show which side copied which. But when two broker-style websites use the same high-level template in such a close way, it is something worth noticing. In this sector, repeated templates, recycled layouts, and near-identical site structures often deserve closer attention rather than being dismissed as a minor design coincidence.
Najm Capital has also appeared in a user complaint on WikiFX from the United Arab Emirates. In that post, the user described the platform as a scam and claimed that deposited funds were not truly transferred into real trading activity, alleging that balances shown in the account were not genuine and that withdrawal requests were not fulfilled.

A single complaint does not settle every factual question on its own. But when a complaint like this appears alongside a very low WikiFX score, a licence scope that does not cover forex, and active UAE-facing visibility without local brokerage permission, it becomes part of a broader pattern that cannot be ignored.
Najm Capital presents itself as a modern broker with MT5, its own platform, multiple account types, and familiar payment options. On the surface, the structure looks complete enough to resemble many active regional brokers.
But the regulatory and operational details raise clear concerns.
The WikiFX score is low. The licence shown does not cover forex business, even though forex is being promoted. The broker has visible UAE-facing activity, but no sign here of the UAE licence categories that would normally matter for that market. There is also a user complaint from the UAE and a notable website-template overlap with another broker-style site.
Taken together, these are not small background issues. They are core questions about how the broker is operating, what permissions it actually holds, and how closely its market presentation matches its regulatory footing.
WikiFX is a global broker information platform that provides broker profiles, licence records, user exposure information, and regulatory alerts across multiple jurisdictions. It is widely used by traders to check a platforms background before opening an account or transferring funds.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

9X Markets review 2026: WikiFX score 1.98/10, no forex license, limited UAE advisory license, Mauritius FSC record, and complaints centered in Pakistan and India.

Alpari review 2026: WikiFX score 2.53/10, Belarus license, repeated user complaints, mixed field survey results, and blacklist warnings in multiple jurisdictions.

DBinvesting review 2026: WikiFX score 2.15/10, Seychelles offshore license, UAE advisory license that does not cover forex, mixed field survey results, and recurring user complaints.

ACY Securities review 2026: WikiFX score 7.44/10, ASIC and FSCA licenses, 157 user complaints, withdrawal delays, and pricing-related dispute reports.