She Thought She Found Love. Instead, She Lost 1.5 Million Baht and a Luxury Sports Car.
He Claimed Elite Connections. She Ended Up Losing Millions and Her Dream Car
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
اردو
Abstract:Nishad Singh, the former Director of Engineering, a senior executive at bankrupt cryptocurrency exchange FTX was charged by the United States SEC and CFTC.

Nishad Singh, the former Director of Engineering at bankrupt cryptocurrency exchange, FTX, on Tuesday became the third of close allies of Samuel Bankman-Fried, the exchanges Co-Founder, to plead guilty to fraud charges.
On Tuesday, both the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) accused Singh with misappropriating funds from FTX.com and aiding and abetting Bankman-Fried and hedge fund Alamedia Research LLC in diverting FTX customer assets. CFTC said it charged Sigh before a district court in southern New York.

27-year-old Singh pleaded guilty to six counts of fraud charges including wire fraud, conspiracy to commit fraud, money laundering and deceiving the United States. In December last year, Carline Elison, the former Chief Executive Officer of Alameda Research and Gary Wang, FTXs Chief Technology Officer, pleaded guilty to several counts of criminal crimes.
In its complaint, SEC accused Singh of helping Bankman-Frieds transfer of FTX.com customer assets to Alameda Research by designing a software code that permitted customer cash to be redirected to the crypto hedge fund. This is true even though Bankman-Fried allegedly made FTX investors “false assurances” regarding the security of their money.
These features in the FTX code, which included—and this is crucial—the can withdraw below borrow capability that allowed Alameda to withdraw billions of dollars in customer assets from FTX, among other things, favoured Alameda and allowed it to carry out transactions even when it lacked sufficient funds.
In addition, Singh took around $6 million from FTX for personal use and expenditures, including the purchase of a multi-million dollar home and contributions to charitable organisations, the SEC stated. This took place just before FTX collapsed in November 2022.
Singh has agreed to give up some of the assets he obtained from FTX and Alamedia Research, the CFTC has noted. Even while charges were being revealed against the former FTX CEO, the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York made the announcement.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

He Claimed Elite Connections. She Ended Up Losing Millions and Her Dream Car

Octa vs XTB Showdown: One Is Banned By The RBI, The Other Has 24 Years Of Stock-Market Pedigree — Which Should Indian Traders Actually Trust In 2026? If you are an Indian trader who has done even a casual Google search for forex brokers, two names will have crossed your screen — Octa (formerly OctaFX) and XTB. Both are widely advertised, both have massive global followings, and both claim to offer competitive trading conditions for retail traders. But these two brokers could not be more different in their philosophy, regulation, and legal standing in India. Octa is a mobile-first, high-leverage, beginner-friendly offshore broker that has rapidly grown across emerging markets — including, controversially, India. XTB is a 24-year-old publicly-listed European broker with deep Tier-1 regulation that has specifically chosen NOT to accept Indian clients in 2026. Yes, you read that right. XTB does not accept Indian residents. And Octa, the one that does serve Indian residents, has been adde

Walk into any forex marketing pitch in India in 2026 and the first claim you will hear is some variation of "we are regulated by multiple international authorities". The implication is obvious — multiple regulators equals safer brokers. But after WikiFX has documented thousands of complaint cases from Indian and other South Asian traders, one inconvenient truth has become impossible to ignore: Not all regulatory licences are equal. Not even close. A broker can claim "regulated by 5 authorities" — and if those 5 authorities are all offshore-tier (MISA, Vanuatu, Seychelles, Saint Lucia, Comoros), it offers approximately the same protection as no regulation at all. Meanwhile, a single FCA or ASIC licence carries more practical investor protection than a dozen offshore registrations stacked together. This is the WikiFX 2026 ranking of forex brokers by genuine regulatory credibility — measured not by quantity of licences, but by the strength and enforcement weight of the regulators behind

Live from Wealth Expo Colombia 2026: WikiFX Strengthens Growing Partnerships Across LATAM