简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Chicago Trader to Pay $377,000 for Forex and Commodity Fraud Charges
Abstract:The US Commodity Futures Trading Commission ( CFTC ) announced on Tuesday that a court in Illinois entered a consent order for a permanent injunction against Chicago-area trader and his company for Forex and commodity fraud.

Trader's company was also part of the consent order issued by a court in Illinois.
The order also permanently prohibits further violations of the CEA and CFTC
The defendants are Dro Kholamian of Barrington, Illinois and his company, Blue Star Trading, LLC (Blue Star), which had an office in Park Ridge, Illinois. The consent order resolves a CFTC action filed on November 30, 2018 alleging solicitation fraud, misappropriation of client funds, and failing to register with the CFTC as a commodity trading advisor and an associated person.
The order finds that between January 2013 and November 2018, defendants solicited and accepted $995,000 from clients for futures and forex trading through accounts managed by Kholamian and Blue Star.
Through his affiliation with his Armenian church and social contacts of Armenian heritage, Kholamian sought out some clients. Defendants returned $768,000 to their clients and stole $227,000, using those funds to pay other clients in a Ponzi scheme-like fashion, as well as to pay for Kholamian's personal and business expenses.
In addition to $227,000 in restitution, Kholamian and Blue Star must pay a civil monetary penalty of $150,000. In addition to permanently prohibiting further violations of the Act and CFTC regulations, the order imposes permanent registration and trading bans on the defendants.
Recent CFTC Enforcement Actions
Recently, the CFTC filed a civil enforcement action to charge four operators for running a $44 million Bitcoin Ponzi scheme .
Dwayne Golden of Florida, Jatin Patel of India, Marquis Egerton of North Carolina and Gregory Aggesen of New York were charged with fraud for operating Ponzi schemes involving Bitcoin, for fraudulently soliciting more than $44 million of investments, and for misappropriating millions of dollars. Golden, Patel and Egerton are accused of fraudulently soliciting more than $23 million worth of Bitcoins through the websites Empowercoin and Ecoinplus.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Garanti BBVA Securities Exposed: Traders Report Unfair Charges & Poor Customer Service
Have you been financially ruined through chargebacks allowed by Garanti BBVA Securities? Do you have to wait for hours to get your queries resolved by the broker’s customer support official? Did the same scenario prevail when you contact the officials in-person? Failed to close your account as Garanti BBVA Securities officials remained unresponsive to your calls? Many have expressed similar concerns while sharing the Garanti BBVA Securities review online. In this article, we have shared some complaints against the broker. Take a look!

In-Depth Review of Stonefort Securities Withdrawals and Funding Methods – What Traders Should Really
For any experienced forex and CFD trader, the mechanics of moving capital are as critical as the trading strategy itself. The efficiency, security, and transparency of a broker's funding procedures form the bedrock of a trustworthy, long-term trading relationship. A broker can offer the tightest spreads and the most advanced platform, but if depositing funds is cumbersome or withdrawing profits is a battle, all other advantages become moot. This review provides a data-driven examination of Stonefort Securities withdrawals and funding methods. We will dissect the available information on payment options, processing times, associated costs, and the real-world user experience. Our analysis is anchored primarily in data from the global broker regulatory inquiry platform, WikiFX, supplemented by a critical look at publicly available information to provide a comprehensive and unbiased perspective for traders evaluating this broker.

MH Markets Deposits and Withdrawals Overview: A Data-Driven Analysis for Traders
For any experienced trader, the integrity of a broker is not just measured by its spreads or platform stability, but by the efficiency and reliability of its financial plumbing. The ability to deposit and, more importantly, withdraw capital without friction is a cornerstone of trust. This review provides an in-depth, data-driven analysis of the MH Markets deposits and withdrawals overview, examining the entire fund management lifecycle—from funding methods and processing speeds to fees and potential obstacles. MH Markets, operating for 5-10 years under the name Mohicans Markets (Ltd), has established a global footprint. With a WikiFX score of 7.08/10, it positions itself as a multi-asset broker offering a range of account types and access to the popular MetaTrader platforms. However, for a discerning trader, the real test lies in the details of its payment systems and the security of their funds. This article dissects the MH Markets funding methods withdrawal experience, leveraging pr

GAIN Capital Review: Exploring Complaints on Withdrawal Denials, Fake Return Promises & More
Is your forex trading experience with GAIN Capital full of financial scams? Does the broker disallow you from withdrawing your funds, including profits? Have you been scammed under the guise of higher return promises by an official? Does the GAIN Capital forex broker not have an effective customer support service for your trading queries? Concerned by this, many traders have shared negative GAIN Capital reviews online. In this article, we have discussed some of them. Read on!
