天眼評分
Fortex · 方達科技
https://www.fortex.com/zh-hant
官方網址
評分指數
影響力
影響力
C
影響力指數 NO.1
聯繫方式
暫未查證到有效監管資訊,請注意風險!
- 經查證,該交易商當前暫無有效外匯監管,請注意風險!
瀏覽Fortex 方達科技 的用戶還瀏覽了..
PU Prime
fpmarkets
官網鑒定
fortex.com
52.42.120.14伺服器所在地美國
備案號--主要訪問國家/地區--功能變數名稱創建時間2001-08-07網站名稱WHOIS.NETWORKSOLUTIONS.COM所屬公司NETWORK SOLUTIONS, LLC.
關係族譜
相關企業
公司簡介
| 方達科技 評論摘要 | |
| 成立年份 | 1997 |
| 註冊國家/地區 | 美國 |
| 監管 | 無監管 |
| 產品 | MT4/5 Bridge OMX、方達科技 XCloud、方達科技 ECN解決方案、方達科技 7和AlgoX |
| 客戶支援 | 在線聊天、聯繫表單 |
| 電話:650.591.8822 | |
| 傳真:650.591.8818 | |
| 電子郵件:info@fortex.com、support@fortex.com | |
| 社交媒體:Twitter、LinkedIn、Facebook、YouTube | |
| 矽谷總部:Palo Alto Square, 3000 El Camino Real, Building 4, Suite 200, Palo Alto, CA 94306, 美國 | |
| 其他分支機構聯繫信息:https://www.fortex.com/en/con | |
方達科技 資訊
方達科技 的總部位於矽谷,是一家技術提供商,為客戶提供從中間件、API到豐富的交易諮詢、分析和定制服務,以及桌面、網頁或移動交易的最終用戶應用程序的技術解決方案。
然而,該經紀商目前在沒有有效監管的情況下運營,這降低了其合法性和可靠性。

優點和缺點
| 優點 | 缺點 |
| 多年的行業經驗 | 無監管 |
| 在線聊天支援 | |
| 多種聯繫渠道 |
監管狀態
監管是評估經紀公司合法性和可靠性的重要方面,在方達科技的情況下,該經紀商在沒有任何有效的監管監督下運營。缺乏監管框架引發了對經紀商遵守行業標準、財務透明度和保護客戶利益的巨大擔憂。

產品與服務
作為金融公司的技術提供商,方達科技為全球的交易者、經紀商、流動性提供商、資金管理人、銀行、對沖基金和投資者提供各種技術解決方案服務,並擁有自己的產品列表。
流動性接入
方達科技 Bridge OMX通過Equinix NY4、HK1和LD4設施將MT4/5交易者連接到全球流動性提供商,確保次秒級往返交易時間和無縫訪問深度流動性池。

低延遲基礎設施
方達科技 XCloud通過專用數據中心提供高頻率、低延遲的連接,實現與一流流動性提供商的數千個並發訂單的高效執行。

交易平台
方達科技 ECN平台,包括方達科技 7和AlgoX,提供了一套全面的交易平台,可交易货币、商品、差价合约和股票,具有用户友好的界面和强大的算法交易功能。

全面解决方案
方達科技整合了全球流动性聚合、基于云的基础设施和先进的交易引擎,提供了最完整的多资产ECN交易生态系统。

企業畫像
- 5-10年
- 監管牌照存疑
- 高級風險隱患
Wiki問答
Is a free demo account available with Fortex, and if so, are there any restrictions, such as a time limit on its use?
Based on my close review of Fortex, I did not find any explicit mention of a free demo account or its specific restrictions, such as time limits, within the available information. While Fortex positions itself primarily as a technology provider rather than a conventional retail broker, it does offer platforms like Fortex 7 and AlgoX and provides trading infrastructure to various clients in the industry. In my experience, most reputable brokers make their demo account policies transparent by clearly stating if and how traders can simulate live trading with virtual funds. The absence of a clearly advertised free demo account at Fortex is something I regard as a potential drawback, especially for those who value transparency and risk management when testing new platforms or strategies. Given their unregulated status and the high-risk warning attached to Fortex, I am particularly cautious about engaging with any service that does not lay out its demo trading conditions in detail. Without regulatory oversight, it is essential to have all relevant terms—demo or live—fully disclosed. Personally, I expect clear, accessible information regarding demo accounts as part of a broker or platform’s commitment to customer experience and financial safety. Until I could confirm the details directly from Fortex, I would not assume a free, unrestricted demo environment is available for prospective users. For me, this lack of clarity contributes significantly to my overall risk assessment of the provider.
What would you identify as the primary advantages and disadvantages of trading through Fortex?
Based on my experience and after closely examining Fortex, I find the evaluation complex and it requires caution, especially when making decisions about where to entrust my trading capital. A clear advantage for me is Fortex’s technological offering—its suite of ECN trading platforms, including Fortex 7 and AlgoX, plus direct liquidity access and low-latency infrastructure, stand out as sophisticated features designed for both high-frequency and algorithmic trading. Over the years, this kind of tech focus has often translated to faster executions and potentially lower trading costs, both important for my strategy. However, the absence of any valid regulatory oversight is, in my judgment, a critical drawback. Regulation exists not just as a bureaucratic requirement, but to uphold transparency, protect client interests, and provide recourse in the case of disputes or broker failures. With Fortex lacking such oversight, I am left without assurance regarding the segregation of client funds, dispute resolution, or adherence to industry standards. User experiences seem mixed—some describe stable conditions and satisfactory performance, while others raise serious concerns over trade execution integrity and insufficient customer support. In short, while the technical infrastructure might appeal to advanced traders like myself, the regulatory gap represents a significant risk I cannot overlook. Personally, I would approach trading with Fortex very cautiously, prioritizing safety and capital protection above all else.
How do Fortex’s swap fees for overnight positions stack up against those charged by other brokers?
Assessing Fortex’s overnight swap fees compared to other brokers is challenging, as the available information doesn’t clearly specify their fee structure for holding positions overnight. In my experience as a trader, the transparency and competitiveness of swap rates are very important; established and regulated brokers typically make these details public and easily accessible. However, with Fortex, not only is there a lack of regulation—raising my personal caution levels—but there’s also limited data on their actual trading costs, including swap fees. From what I could gather, Fortex is positioned more as a technology provider and liquidity bridge than a client-facing retail broker, which complicates direct swaps comparisons. Most of the industry’s reputable brokers list their overnight financing costs clearly, helping me to calculate my long-term trade expenses and risk management. The absence of publicly available swap rate information from Fortex would force me to reach out directly to their team or possibly even open an account just to access these details, which is far from ideal for informed decision-making. Ultimately, because I place heavy emphasis on transparency and regulatory oversight—especially when it comes to any fees that can erode trading profits over time—I would be very cautious about engaging with a broker that does not disclose its swap fees upfront or is not regulated. For me, this makes it impossible to confidently compare Fortex’s swap costs with those of more established brokers.
Would it be safe and reliable to trade with Fortex as my broker?
In my experience as a trader, the first thing I look for in any broker is robust regulatory oversight. With Fortex, this is immediately a concern—there is no valid regulation in place according to all available data. For me, this is a significant red flag because regulation is not simply a bureaucratic formality; it’s an essential safeguard for trader funds and a mechanism to hold brokers accountable to fair practices. Operating without supervision undermines a broker’s credibility, raises questions about financial transparency, and, most importantly, complicates recourse for clients in the event of disputes or issues with execution. While Fortex has an established presence in the industry and offers sophisticated technology solutions and fast order execution, none of this can replace the protection that legitimate oversight provides. My exposure to unregulated entities, even those with innovative platforms or positive user feedback, has always been overshadowed by the increased risks—especially when it comes to withdrawal and dispute resolution. There are also neutral and negative user reports that echo concerns such as trade manipulation and lack of effective customer service. In my view, these should not be taken lightly, since real-time communication and transparency are critical when problems arise. To sum up, based on what I know and what I value as a trader—security of funds, dispute protection, and regulatory transparency—I would not consider Fortex a safe or reliable choice for trading. The risks associated with their unregulated status are too significant for my comfort.
用戶評價 3
你要評價的內容
請輸入...

