Dufourbit Warning: FCA Says the Firm Is Unauthorised—7 Checks Before You Pay
The FCA warned about Dufourbit on 19 August 2026. Check the named domain, contact details, missing protections and seven steps before making any payment.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
اردو
Abstract:Police in Sarikei identify four bank account owners linked to online scams, with victims losing over RM475,000 in investment and tender frauds.

Police have identified four individuals whose bank accounts were used to receive funds in two recent online fraud cases in Sarikei, although no arrests have been made so far.
Sarikei district police chief Superintendent Aswandy Anis said the accounts were registered under company names that are not operating in the district, raising further suspicion over how they were used. Investigations are ongoing under Section 420 of the Penal Code for cheating. He added that account holders who knowingly allowed their accounts to be used by others could also face charges under Section 424C(1) of the Penal Code (Amendment 2024).
One of the cases involved a contractor in his 50s who lost about RM460,000 after falling for a fake online investment scheme earlier this month. The second case involved a private pharmacy officer in his 30s, who was cheated of around RM15,000 after being offered a tender to supply medical equipment in Sarikei.
In the latter case, the victim lodged a police report yesterday after realising he had been duped. Superintendent Aswandy said the victim had been contacted by a man posing as an officer from the Sarawak Social Welfare Department. Believing the offer to be genuine, the victim made several payments into two different bank accounts.
However, the promised medical equipment never arrived, and the suspect later blocked the victims phone number and cut off all contact. Police have urged the public to remain cautious of unsolicited investment or tender offers, especially those that require upfront payments.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

The FCA warned about Dufourbit on 19 August 2026. Check the named domain, contact details, missing protections and seven steps before making any payment.

Was your trading experience with Warren Bowie & Smith, a Mauritius-based brokerage entity, not so fruitful? Did the broker tempt you into trading by giving you assurances of profits that never appeared on the Warren Bowie & Smith login dashboard? Did you struggle to withdraw profits from the trading platform? Upon your withdrawal request, did the broker official make you invest further? This Warren Bowie & Smith review examines serious trading allegations against the broker. Additionally, we have provided the broker’s regulatory status.

Angel One, an India-based brokerage entity, constantly receives allegations from users online. Users are complaining about withheld funds, poor customer support service, undesired trade execution orders, etc. In this Angel One review, let’s quickly go through these complaints, understand its regulatory framework and pay attention to the product portfolio.

AuroraEx, a United States-based multi-asset brokerage entity, is facing serious user allegations over how it handles deposited funds. Many users have accused the broker of failing to meet its payment obligations. Some have questioned the broker over possible trade-related foul play, while others have alleged that it scammed them through a Ponzi operation. This AuroraEx review examines these user-reported allegations and provides an overview of the broker’s regulatory status.