简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract：CySEC flags five unlicensed trading websites targeting European investors and urges investors to exercise due diligence via its official register before depositing funds.
The Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC) has released a new warning identifying five trading websites that are not authorized to provide investment services under Cyprus law. Published on 18 December 2025, the notice underscores that these domains are not linked to any firm licensed under Article 5 of Law 87(I)/2017, the country's principal framework for investment services.
Websites Listed by CySEC
CySEC advises investors to consult its official register before engaging with any platform claiming to operate in Cyprus. Only entities formally listed as licensed are legally permitted to provide investment services.
Investor alerts have become a regular feature of CySEC's enforcement activity. Cyprus hosts a significant number of EU-regulated retail trading firms under MiFID II, making it a focal point for platforms targeting European investors.
While CySEC‘s notices stop short of detailed allegations, the implication is clear: the listed websites are either operating without authorization or misrepresenting their regulatory status. Similar warnings are routinely issued by other European regulators, including Germany’s BaFin, France‘s AMF, and Italy’s Consob.
These alerts serve multiple purposes: they protect retail investors, provide reference material for banks and payment processors, and support cross-border supervisory cooperation.
CySEC's enforcement history shows two recurring categories:
1. Unlicensed Investment Platforms
These sites actively solicit clients while falsely claiming to be authorized. They often promote forex, CFDs, cryptocurrencies, or managed investment products, targeting multiple jurisdictions through online advertising.
2. Clone or Look-Alike Websites
Such platforms mimic the branding or regulatory language of legitimate firms to appear credible. They may use similar domain names, logos, or references to EU regulation without holding any license. For example, domains that add numbers or modifiers to well-known firm names are a common tactic used to mislead investors.
European regulators have documented consistent tactics used by unauthorized platforms:
In many cases, communication eventually ceases. Regulators also warn about follow-on recovery scams, in which fraudsters pose as regulators or law firms to extract additional payments.
CySEC emphasizes that investors must independently verify a firm's authorization before transferring funds or sharing personal information. Its public register lists licensed entities, approved domains, and the specific services each firm is permitted to provide.
The regulator also clarifies that it does not contact individuals directly about investments and that it never requests payments to recover losses. Any communication claiming to originate from CySEC outside official channels should be treated as suspicious.
The frequency of such warnings highlights ongoing challenges in regulating online trading platforms. As digital finance expands, regulators face increasing pressure to safeguard retail investors against unauthorized schemes. CySEC's proactive alerts underscore the importance of vigilance, transparency, and cross-border cooperation in maintaining trust in Europes financial markets.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
HYCM Capital Markets (UK) Limited reported a £236,304 loss for 2025, as higher administrative costs offset a small rise in revenue and reversed the previous year’s profit.
XELLION, a Saint Lucia-based forex broker, is reportedly facing many complaints from users. Among the complaints, the lack of smooth fund withdrawals remains the most disturbing one. This issue was not only highlighted by real users but also the Introducing Broker (IB) who expressed shock over this issue on broker review platforms. In this XELLION review article, we have examined these allegations against the brokerage entity.
If you're looking for information about AssetsFX deposit and AssetsFX withdrawal processes, you're taking a smart step when choosing a broker. However, when it comes to AssetsFX, we need to discuss some serious concerns right away. While its website shows many modern payment options that look good, many user reports tell a very different and worrying story, especially about people not being able to get their funds back. Keep reading!
When traders look at a new broker, the most important question is always about safety. This is especially true for AssetsFX, a broker whose online presence raises a serious question: Is AssetsFX safe or a scam? The answer isn't immediately obvious, as the broker has a very divided reputation. When you search for user feedback, you find two completely different stories. On the one hand, there are many positive reviews. On the other side, there are very serious claims of financial wrongdoing. This article won't waste your time. Our goal is to look through all the information, from regulatory status to real user AssetsFX complaints, to help you understand the major risks and make a smart decision about your investments.
WikiFXWikiFXWikiFXWikiFXWikiFXWikiFXWikiFXWikiFXWikiFXWikiFX
