Swissquote Scam Alert: 53/64 Negative Cases Exposed
Swissquote has 53/64 negative cases on WikiFX despite regulation (FINMA/FCA). Reports cite deposit delays & withdrawals. Avoid scams, read exposure now!
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:BitPania is a relatively new brokerage established in 2024 and registered in Saint Lucia. The platform markets itself as a digital trading solution offering multiple account types and support for automated trading (EAs). However, potential investors should approach with significant caution. Currently, BitPania holds a WikiFX Score of 1.20, a very low rating that reflects its lack of regulatory oversight and recent user complaints regarding withdrawals.

BitPania is a relatively new brokerage established in 2024 and registered in Saint Lucia. The platform markets itself as a digital trading solution offering multiple account types and support for automated trading (EAs). However, potential investors should approach with significant caution. Currently, BitPania holds a WikiFX Score of 1.20, a very low rating that reflects its lack of regulatory oversight and recent user complaints regarding withdrawals.
The following points summarize the key features and risks associated with this broker based on current data:
When evaluating the safety of a broker, the primary factor is regulatory oversight.
Regulatory Status: Unregulated
According to the available data, BitPania is not regulated by any recognized financial institution. The broker is registered in Saint Lucia, a jurisdiction often used by offshore entities due to its relaxed registration requirements. Unlike brokers regulated by Tier-1 authorities (such as the FCA in the UK or ASIC in Australia), BitPania is not legally required to segregate client funds or participate in compensation schemes in the event of insolvency.
The WikiFX system has assigned BitPania a score of 1.20, which is considered high-risk. Operating without a license means there is no government body monitoring the broker's activities to ensure fair trading practices. Traders have no recourse through an ombudsman if disputes arise regarding pricing or withdrawals.
In the last three months, WikiFX has received multiple complaints regarding BitPania, specifically from users in regions like Colombia. The common themes involve inability to withdraw funds and account blocking.
Users have reported severe difficulties when attempting to access their capital. One user detailed an experience where, after accumulating a balance of nearly $7,134, their account was blocked while trades were open, resulting in significant losses. When the user attempted to resolve the issue, an analyst allegedly demanded an additional $2,019 deposit to “recover” losses. When the user refused, the remaining balance was withheld under the guise of operational costs.

Another case highlights aggressive sales tactics. A trader reported starting with a small investment ($244) but was pressured to add $3,000 more. After investing a total of over $2,000 and growing the account to $7,000, the user found their inquiries about withdrawals were ignored. Eventually, the account was blocked, and communication with the advisor ceased completely.
A third report describes a scenario where the broker requested upfront deposits to pay “taxes” before a withdrawal could be processed. The user was directed to register on external crypto platforms, but after complying, messages were ignored and calls were rejected.

BitPania offers a tiered account structure, but the entry barriers are significantly higher than the industry average.
The broker offers seven account types, but even the entry-level “Basic” account requires a deposit of $5,000, which is unusually high for a retail broker. The tiers are as follows:
Leverage offerings vary by account type.
High leverage (1:100) can amplify potential profits but also increases the risk of rapid capital loss, especially when combined with an unregulated environment.
BitPania presents several critical warning signs for potential investors. While the broker supports automated trading and offers a variety of account types, the lack of regulation, the high minimum deposit of $5,000, and the low WikiFX Score of 1.20 outweigh these features. Furthermore, documented user complaints regarding blocked accounts and withdrawal denials suggest a high level of risk.
Investors are strongly advised to prioritize brokers that hold valid licenses from reputable regulatory bodies.
To stay safe and view the latest regulatory certificates, check BitPania on the WikiFX App.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

Swissquote has 53/64 negative cases on WikiFX despite regulation (FINMA/FCA). Reports cite deposit delays & withdrawals. Avoid scams, read exposure now!

Money Plant FX is offshore, unregulated, and flagged high risk, with traders alleging zeroed balances. Check the facts before you open an account.

When looking at a forex broker, traders often find confusing and mixed information. This is exactly what happens with ACY Securities. On one side, it's a broker that has been operating for 10-15 years and has a good license from the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC). On the other hand, there are many serious complaints that show a very different story. As of early 2026, websites, such as WikiFX, have lowered the broker's score because they received over 156 user complaints, with a total of 182 "Exposure" reports filed. This creates a big problem for people who might want to use this broker. The main question this article will answer is: Is ACY SECURITIES legit, or are the many ACY SECURITIES scam claims actually true about how it does business? We will look at facts we can prove, study the broker's rules and regulations, examine the patterns in user complaints, and give a clear, fact-based answer about the risks of working with this broker. Our goal is to cut thr

ACY Securities shows a complicated picture for traders. On one side, it is a well-known broker that has been running for more than ten years and has a license from a top-level regulator. On the other side, it is a company that faces many serious complaints from users and official warnings from several international financial authorities. This ACY SECURITIES Review aims to explain these differences. We will give a fair and thorough analysis of both what the broker advertises and the serious risks that users have reported. At its heart, ACY Securities is a story of attractive trading conditions that are overshadowed by major user complaints and questions about whether it can be trusted. Our goal is to examine the facts, look at the evidence, and help you make a completely informed decision about your capital’s safety.