简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
SEC Sues Carole Liston, Stock Purse Trading for $5.7M Fraud
Abstract:SEC files lawsuit against Carole Liston and Stock Purse Trading for allegedly running a Ponzi-like scheme, misusing $5.7M from 200+ investors nationwide.

SEC Files Major Enforcement Action Against Florida Investment Firm
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has launched a high-profile lawsuit against Stock Purse Trading, LLC, Liston Associates, Inc., and their owner, Carole Liston, alleging a multi-million dollar fraudulent securities offering with Ponzi-like characteristics. The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida on August 18, 2025, marks one of the most significant investment fraud cases in the region this year.
Fraudulent Promises and Investor Losses
According to the SECs detailed complaint, from August 2020 through July 2024, Liston and her companies raised approximately $5.7 million from more than 200 investors across the United States. Investors were enticed with claims of extraordinary monthly returns—ranging from 5% to 20%—with Liston allegedly promising to double their money in just 30 to 60 days. She even boasted of achieving 350% annual profits through her proprietary trading algorithm and pooled investment strategy.
Listons marketing materials emphasized her supposed expertise in options trading and short selling, presenting herself as a seasoned professional with a track record of personal trading success. However, the SEC asserts these claims were largely fabricated, designed to create an air of Experience and Trustworthiness that would appeal to both novice and experienced investors searching for high-yield opportunities.

Misuse of Funds and False Account Statements
The SECs investigation found that only a small fraction of investor funds were actually used for trading activities. When Liston traded, her strategies resulted in significant losses rather than the promised gains. Meanwhile, she allegedly misappropriated at least $450,000 for personal expenses and used approximately $3.9 million to make “Ponzi-like” payments to earlier investors—a hallmark of fraudulent securities offerings and investment fraud.
Further compounding the deception, Liston allegedly provided investors with falsified online account summaries, showing consistently high returns that did not reflect the reality of their investments. These fabricated statements were accessible through Stock Purse Tradings website, misleading investors about the safety and security of their capital.
Legal Charges and Regulatory Response
The SECs lawsuit accuses Liston and her companies of violating key federal securities laws, including Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and related rules. The complaint also cites violations of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, emphasizing the severity of the alleged misconduct.
The SEC is seeking permanent injunctions to bar Liston and her firms from future securities offerings, as well as disgorgement of ill-gotten gains—plus interest—and civil penalties. This enforcement action underscores the agencys commitment to protecting investors and maintaining market integrity, especially in cases involving Ponzi-like investment schemes and misappropriation of investor funds.
Context and Investor Protection
This case is a stark reminder of the risks associated with high-return investment opportunities that seem too good to be true. It also highlights the importance of conducting thorough due diligence, verifying an adviser‘s credentials, and understanding the regulatory protections available to investors. The SEC’s swift action in this investment fraud case in Florida serves as a warning to both would-be fraudsters and the investing public.
Readers seeking more information about the Carole Liston SEC lawsuit details, Stock Purse Trading fraud case, or general guidance on avoiding investment scams are encouraged to consult official SEC resources and registered financial professionals.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Garanti BBVA Securities Exposed: Traders Report Unfair Charges & Poor Customer Service
Have you been financially ruined through chargebacks allowed by Garanti BBVA Securities? Do you have to wait for hours to get your queries resolved by the broker’s customer support official? Did the same scenario prevail when you contact the officials in-person? Failed to close your account as Garanti BBVA Securities officials remained unresponsive to your calls? Many have expressed similar concerns while sharing the Garanti BBVA Securities review online. In this article, we have shared some complaints against the broker. Take a look!

GAIN Capital Review: Exploring Complaints on Withdrawal Denials, Fake Return Promises & More
Is your forex trading experience with GAIN Capital full of financial scams? Does the broker disallow you from withdrawing your funds, including profits? Have you been scammed under the guise of higher return promises by an official? Does the GAIN Capital forex broker not have an effective customer support service for your trading queries? Concerned by this, many traders have shared negative GAIN Capital reviews online. In this article, we have discussed some of them. Read on!

GCash Rolls Out Virtual US Account to Cut Forex Fees for Filipinos
GCash launches its Virtual US Account in the Philippines, cutting forex fees and empowering freelancers with higher take-home pay.

"Just 9 More Lots": Inside the Endless Withdrawal Loop at Grand Capital
Multiple investors are reporting a disturbing pattern of blocked funds and shifting requirements at Grand Capital. While the broker claims validity, regulatory bodies across three jurisdictions have issued warnings or blacklisted the entity entirely. The data suggests significant risk for anyone currently holding funds on this platform.
