简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
FINRA imposes $900k fine on Brex Treasury
Abstract:Brex Treasury LLC has reached a settlement with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) to resolve allegations related to its anti-money laundering (AML) compliance practices. As part of the settlement, Brex Treasury has agreed to pay a fine of $900,000 and accept a censure.

Brex Treasury LLC has reached a settlement with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) to resolve allegations related to its anti-money laundering (AML) compliance practices. As part of the settlement, Brex Treasury has agreed to pay a fine of $900,000 and accept a censure.
The settlement stems from Brex Treasurys use of an automated identity-verification algorithm that failed to meet AML requirements. The algorithm, which was intended to verify the identities of beneficial owners and customers, had several critical shortcomings.
Algorithm Design Flaws
Initially, Brex Treasurys identity-verification system relied on a limited set of customer information—names and phone numbers—to match identities with those in third-party databases. This approach proved inadequate, as it did not collect all the necessary identifying details, such as dates of birth, addresses, or identification numbers, required under the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) regulations.
In January 2021, the firm began collecting more comprehensive data, including names, dates of birth, addresses, and identification numbers. Despite this, the system still fell short. The algorithm was designed to approve accounts based on matches in vendor databases, but it did not adequately address discrepancies in the date of birth or address, which could signal potential identity fraud.
Fraud Check Limitations
Brex Treasurys automated fraud checks, which included an external fraud score from a third-party vendor, were also insufficiently rigorous. The fraud score, intended to assess the risk of identity fraud, was not always accompanied by thorough manual reviews of discrepancies flagged during fraud checks. As a result, the firm approved accounts that had significant red flags.
Inadequate Manual Reviews
The firms manual customer screening process was equally flawed. From 2020 to 2021, Brex Treasury approved hundreds of potentially fraudulent accounts. These accounts attempted transactions exceeding $15 million using funds that failed to settle. Many deposits were recalled or rejected due to issues such as insufficient funds, leaving the firm unable to recover the funds or verify customer identities.
Regulatory Violations
The failures in Brex Treasury‘s AML practices led to violations of FINRA Rules 3310(b) and 2010. These rules mandate that firms maintain adequate policies and procedures for AML compliance. The firm’s inability to effectively vet customer identities and prevent fraudulent transactions highlighted significant gaps in its compliance framework.
Settlement Details
In addition to the $900,000 fine, Brex Treasury has agreed to a censure as part of the settlement with FINRA. The censure and financial penalty underscore the importance of robust AML practices and the need for firms to ensure that their identity verification systems are designed to meet regulatory standards.
This settlement serves as a reminder for financial institutions to continuously evaluate and improve their compliance mechanisms to prevent similar lapses and protect against financial crime.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

InterTrader Exposed: Traders Report Unfair Account Blocks, Profit Removal & Additional Fee for Withd
Does InterTrader block your forex trading account, giving inexplicable reasons? Does the broker flag you with latency trading and cancel all your profits? Do you have to pay additional fees for withdrawals? Did the UK-based forex broker fail to recognize the deposit you made? Does the customer service fail to address your trading queries? In this InterTrader review article, we have shared such complaints. Read them out.

Grand Capital Doesn’t Feel GRAND for Traders with Withdrawal Denials & Long Processing Times
The trading environment does not seem that rosy for traders at Grand Capital, a Seychelles-based forex broker. Traders’ requests for withdrawals are alleged to be in the review process for months, making them frustrated and helpless. Despite meeting the guidelines, traders find it hard to withdraw funds, as suggested by their complaints online. What’s also troubling traders are long processing times concerning Grand Capital withdrawals. In this Grand Capital review segment, we have shared some complaints for you to look at. Read on!

ADSS Review: Traders Say NO to Trading B’coz of Withdrawal Blocks, Account Freeze & Trade Issues
Does ADSS give you plenty of excuses to deny you access to withdrawals? Is your withdrawal request pending for months or years? Do you witness account freezes from the United Arab Emirates-based forex broker? Do you struggle to open and close your forex positions on the ADSS app? Does the customer support service fail to respond to your trading queries? All these issues have become a rage online. In this ADSS Broker review article, we have highlighted actual trader wordings on these issues. Keep reading!

INGOT Brokers Regulation 2025: ASIC vs Offshore License - What Traders Must Know
Explore INGOT Brokers regulation in 2025: Compare their ASIC and Seychelles FSA licenses, understand trader protection levels, and learn about potential risks in this detailed guide.
