简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
SEC Takes Action Against Algorithmic Trading Fraud Involving Over $1.5 Million
Abstract:The SEC charged Matthew Melton with fraud, alleging he misled investors about his algorithmic trading scheme, collecting over $3.4 million. Melton claimed his algorithm could generate 12% monthly returns but was unprofitable, misusing over $1.5 million for personal expenses and Ponzi-like payments.

In a significant move to safeguard investor interests, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has recently brought charges against Matthew Melton for defrauding investors through misleading representations related to his algorithmic trading scheme. This decisive action by the SEC underlines its commitment to uphold the integrity of financial markets and protect investors from deceptive practices.
Background of the Case
The case centers around Melton's algorithmic trading approach, specifically his Price Physics trading algorithm. From April 1, 2018, to October 31, 2020, Melton allegedly collected over $3.4 million from at least 23 investors, primarily based in Puerto Rico and sharing a common interest in outdoor activities. Melton's claim that his algorithm could generate consistent monthly returns of 12% was central to attracting these investments. However, contrary to his assertions, the SEC's complaint reveals that Melton's trading activities were consistently unprofitable.
Further complicating the issue, Melton is accused of misappropriating over $1.5 million of the invested funds. Instead of employing the funds as intended for algorithmic trading, he allegedly used them for personal expenses, including travel, sailing, and mortgage payments. This misuse of funds also involved Ponzi-like payments to other investors, a severe breach of trust and financial ethics.
SEC's Legal Actions
The SEC's complaint, filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, charges Melton with violations of federal securities laws. The Commission seeks extensive relief measures, including permanent injunctive relief, disgorgement with prejudgment interest, civil penalties, and an officer-and-director bar against Melton. This comprehensive legal action underscores the SEC's dedication to enforcing securities laws and ensuring fair play in the investment arena.

In a parallel development, the U.S. Attorneys Office for the Southern District of New York has announced criminal charges against Melton, highlighting the severity of the alleged misconduct.
The Role of the SEC
The Securities and Exchange Commission, as a federal agency, plays a pivotal role in regulating and overseeing the securities industry. Its mission is to protect investors, maintain fair, orderly, and efficient markets, and facilitate capital formation. The SEC's actions against fraudulent activities, like the case against Melton, are vital in maintaining investor confidence and the integrity of financial markets.
Conclusion
The SEC's action in the Melton case is a clear message to the investment community about the seriousness with which it approaches its mandate of investor protection. This case serves as a reminder of the risks involved in algorithmic trading and the importance of due diligence by investors. The SEC remains vigilant in its pursuit of those who seek to undermine the financial system through fraudulent activities.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Firsttrade Review: Traders Raise Ponzi-Style Scam Concerns, Withdrawal Denials & More Issues
Have you lost all your capital while trading via Firsttrade? Does the US-based forex broker disallow you from withdrawing funds? Do you have to pay massive fees when transferring funds? Does your trade get affected because of frequent malfunction in the trading app? These have been haunting many traders at Firsttrade. Consequently, many of them have raised complaints online. In this Firsttrade review, we have shared such complaints. Keep reading to know about them.

Don’t Get Scammed: A Roundup of Common Online Fraud Tactics in Forex
Forex scams are evolving faster than ever; learn the most common tactics (cloned platforms, fake investment managers, fake recovery services) and how to spot them before you deposit.

Defcofx Review: Spread Manipulation & Poor Customer Support Outrage Traders
Does the poor customer support service leave you stunned when trading via Defcofx? Do you receive blunt, negative responses from the support team on several trading queries? Does the Saint Lucia-based forex broker pile on the losses for you by manipulating forex spread charges? In this Defcofx review, we have shared some complaints made against the broker. This will further answer your question: Is Defcofx real or fake?

Ponzi Scheme Operator Sentenced to 14 Years in Western Australia
Chris Marco, a Ponzi scheme operator, was sentenced to 14 years for a $34 million investment fraud in Western Australia. Read about the case and its impact.
