简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract：The Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS), the UK's statutory Deposit insurance and investors compensation scheme, recently announced forecast administrative costs of £89.2 million for 2022/23 and £99.8 million for 23/24.
The forecast costs include the day-to-day operating costs of the FSCS and associated claims processing costs.
In addition, the total levy, including administration costs and estimated compensation, for 2023/24 is expected to remain at £478 million.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and Prudential Regulation Authority will consult on a £109.8 million 2023/24 Management ExpenseS Levy Limit (MELL), which includes a proposed FSCA management expense budget of £99.8 million and an unlevied reserve of £10 million.
Caroline Rainbird, chief executive of the FSCA, said claims-processing infrastructure and support costs make up the largest proportion of the budgeted management costs for 2023/24, amounting to 76% of the total budget, or £75.9m. This cost enables FSCS to perform its core function of helping customers get back on track as quickly as possible.
The budget for 2023/24 has been increased by 5% year-on-year. Caroline says “Although today we have the right teams and systems in place to process claims and make recoveries, the sheer complexity of claims now coming to FSCA means that we are likely to see costs increase over the coming years.”
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
HYCM Capital Markets (UK) Limited reported a £236,304 loss for 2025, as higher administrative costs offset a small rise in revenue and reversed the previous year’s profit.
XELLION, a Saint Lucia-based forex broker, is reportedly facing many complaints from users. Among the complaints, the lack of smooth fund withdrawals remains the most disturbing one. This issue was not only highlighted by real users but also the Introducing Broker (IB) who expressed shock over this issue on broker review platforms. In this XELLION review article, we have examined these allegations against the brokerage entity.
If you're looking for information about AssetsFX deposit and AssetsFX withdrawal processes, you're taking a smart step when choosing a broker. However, when it comes to AssetsFX, we need to discuss some serious concerns right away. While its website shows many modern payment options that look good, many user reports tell a very different and worrying story, especially about people not being able to get their funds back. Keep reading!
When traders look at a new broker, the most important question is always about safety. This is especially true for AssetsFX, a broker whose online presence raises a serious question: Is AssetsFX safe or a scam? The answer isn't immediately obvious, as the broker has a very divided reputation. When you search for user feedback, you find two completely different stories. On the one hand, there are many positive reviews. On the other side, there are very serious claims of financial wrongdoing. This article won't waste your time. Our goal is to look through all the information, from regulatory status to real user AssetsFX complaints, to help you understand the major risks and make a smart decision about your investments.
WikiFXWikiFXWikiFXWikiFXWikiFXWikiFXWikiFXWikiFXWikiFXWikiFX
