简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Citigroup’s Brokerage Subsidiary to Pay £12.6M for Failure to Detect Market Abuse
Abstract:Citigroup Global Markets breached Article 16(2) of MAR, FCA's Principles for Businesses. The institutional brokerage firm has agreed to resolve the case, FCA says.

United Kingdom's Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has fined Citigroup Global Markets, an indirect subsidiary of Citigroup Inc., £12,553,800 for breaching the Market Abuse Regulation (MAR) trade surveillance requirements relating to the detection of market abuse.
Take Advantage of the Biggest Financial Event in London. This year we have expanded to new verticals in Online Trading, Fintech, Digital Assets, Blockchain, and Payments.
FCA, which announced the fine on Friday in a statement, said the institutional brokerage services company failed to properly implement the regulation.
As a result, the broker breached Article 16(2) of MAR and Principle 2 of the FCAs Principles for Businesses, the regulator added.
While Article 16(2) requires organizations involved in arranging or executing transactions in financial instruments to establish and maintain effective arrangements, systems, and procedures to detect and report potential market abuse, Principle 2 demands that “a firm must conduct its business with due skill, care, and diligence.”
“By failing to properly implement the MAR trade surveillance requirements, Citigroup Global Markets could not effectively monitor its trading activities for certain types of insider dealing and market manipulation,” FCA explained.
The watchdog further explained that Citigroup Global Markets flawed execution opened up gaps in its arrangements, systems, and procedures for additional trade surveillance.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

FXPIG Exposed: Traders Report Withdrawal Denials, Fund Scams & Regulatory Flags
Do you face massive losses due to astonishing spreads at FXPIG? Have you witnessed multiple trade executions by the Georgia-based forex broker even though you wanted to execute a single order? Has this piled on losses for you? Is the FXPIG withdrawal too slow? Maybe your trading issues resonate with some of your fellow traders. In this FXPIG review article, we have shared these issues so that you can introspect them thoroughly before deciding on the best forex trader.

Understanding What Makes a Good Spread in Forex
Find out what a good spread in forex trading is, typically between 0 to 5 pips, and why it matters for traders aiming to reduce expenses.

Does WealthFX Generate Wealth or Losses for Traders? Find Out in This Review
The name WealthFX sounds appealing for all those wishing for a rewarding forex journey. However, behind the aspiring name are multiple complaints against the Comoros-based forex broker. These trading complaints dampen the broker’s reputation in the forex community. In this WealthFX review article, we have shared some of these complaints here. Take a look!

FXPrimus Review: Is FXPrimus Regulated and Reliable for 2025?
FXPrimus is a CySEC-regulated forex broker offering MT4, MT5, and WebTrader with flexible leverage and diverse trading instruments since 2009.

