ehamarkets Review 2026: Regulation, Score and Reliability
ehamarkets review: WikiFX score 1.24/10, no valid regulation, extreme trading risks. Read this warning before investing with ehamarkets.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:The broker witnessed two consecutive record months in 2022. The number of active clients on the platform also touched record.

Exness published the retail trading metrics on its platform for February, which turned out to be a record month for the broker. The total trading volume for the month came in at almost $1.59 trillion, making it the best month for the broker in its operational history.
The Cyprus-headquartered retail forex and contracts for differences (CFDs) broker has been seeing a flood in demand for trading activities for a while now. It has become one of the very few retail forex brokers to handle monthly trading volume above $1 trillion, and after the barrier was breached last October, it only went upwards.
The figures for February increased by 5 percent from the previous month but took a massive upward leap of 137 percent when compared with the same month of the previous year.
Along with the trading volume, the number of active clients on the retail trading volume hit another record. The broker ended the month with 269,692 active clients, which is a month-over-month jump of almost 5 percent.
Exness is an established brand in Europe, but the broker is now focusing on markets outside the continent. It has obtained several regulatory licenses over the years and is expanding aggressively in Asia and other emerging markets.
A Record Month in Trading
Meanwhile, February turned out to be one of the record months in the trading industry for both retail and institutional traders. Despite having only 20 trading days, the growing geopolitical tensions pushed the activities in the market higher.
Furthermore, other institutional platforms like FXSpotStream and Cboe FX reported a solid uptick in trading volumes that mostly came from the institutions.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

ehamarkets review: WikiFX score 1.24/10, no valid regulation, extreme trading risks. Read this warning before investing with ehamarkets.

LMAX GROUP review: FCA regulation, WikiFX score 7.51/10, trader complaints, risks, and broker comparison. Is LMAX GROUP safe for traders?

Is withdrawal issue perennial for Phyntex Markets traders like you? Does the Comoros-based forex broker give you numerous excuses to deny you withdrawals? Faced account blocks when raising Phyntex Markets withdrawal queries? Feel that the broker’s customer support service does not exist for you? Many traders have openly expressed frustration on how the broker goes about its business on review platforms. In this Phyntex Markets review article, we have shared multiple complaints against the broker. Keep reading to know the same.

Have you made multiple unsuccessful attempts to withdraw funds from your Tifia forex trading account? Registered successful trades but could not withdraw because of inadequate customer support service? Have you been facing capital losses due to severe slippage on the Tifia login? These issues have become increasingly common for traders here. Many of them have made such allegations on broker review platforms. In this Tifia review article, we have explored some scam allegations. Take a look!