Is TradingMoon Regulation Strict or Light-Touch?
TradingMoon operates under offshore regulation by Seychelles FSA. License SD042 covers forex and derivatives trading.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:DBInvesting regulation is offshore under Seychelles FSA, offering oversight but limited protection, with reported withdrawal risks for traders.

The legitimacy of any broker begins with its regulatory framework. DBInvesting presents itself as a multi-licensed entity, operating under the Seychelles Financial Services Authority (FSA), the UAE Securities and Commodities Authority (SCA), and Canadas FINTRAC. At first glance, this might suggest a diversified compliance structure. Yet, deeper analysis reveals inconsistencies, offshore reliance, and troubling user reports. This article dissects DBInvesting regulation, licenses, trading conditions, and reported cases to determine whether traders can safely engage with this broker.
The Seychelles FSA license, number SD053, is the primary authorization underpinning DBInvestings operations.
This license permits derivatives trading, futures, securities, bonds, and options. However, the FSA is widely regarded as a light-touch offshore regulator, offering limited investor protection compared to Tier-1 regulators such as the UK‘s FCA or Australia’s ASIC.
While technically regulated, the offshore nature of this license means enforcement is minimal. Traders should be aware that offshore regulation often lacks strict capital adequacy requirements, investor compensation schemes, or rigorous compliance monitoring.

DBInvesting also holds an Investment Advisory License (IA) C from the UAEs Securities and Commodities Authority (SCA).
This license is limited to advisory services and explicitly does not authorize forex trading. The absence of forex authorization raises questions about how DBInvesting markets its services in the UAE. Traders expecting full brokerage services under this license may be misled, as the scope is restricted to advisory functions.

A third license is registered under DB PAY LTD with Canadas FINTRAC.
This license permits currency and crypto exchange but does not cover securities or derivatives trading. Once again, the scope of authorization is narrower than DBInvestings advertised services, creating a regulatory mismatch.

Investigations into DBInvestings offices reveal inconsistencies across jurisdictions.
The absence of verifiable offices in Egypt and Cyprus contrasts with the confirmed Seychelles location. This reinforces the offshore-centric nature of DBInvesting regulation and raises concerns about transparency in its claimed global operations.
DBInvesting offers MetaTrader 5 (MT5) and Sirix WebTrader.
Compared to competitors:
DBInvestings dual-platform offering is competitive, but execution speed and server location (Seychelles) may affect latency for traders outside Africa.
DBInvesting provides several account structures:
Demo accounts are available, simulating real market conditions. The leverage offered is 1:1000, which significantly magnifies both profit potential and risk exposure.
| Account Type | Spread | Commission |
| STP | 1 pip | None |
| ECN | 0.0 pips | $4 per lot per side |
| PRO | 0.3 pips | $1.50 per lot per side |
| Islamic | 1 pip | None |
| Islamic+ | 0.0 pips | None |
The ECN and Islamic+ accounts advertise ultra-tight spreads, but commission structures vary. Traders should weigh whether lower spreads justify higher per-lot fees.
DBInvesting Regulation permits trading across five asset classes:
This multi-asset offering is broad, aligning with industry standards.
DBInvesting integrates copy trading via MT5 and Sirix.
This feature appeals to novice traders but requires caution given the brokers regulatory limitations.
Withdrawal processes remain opaque, with multiple user complaints alleging blocked or delayed transactions. This is a critical red flag for traders considering DBInvesting.
Several cases documented in 2025 highlight troubling practices:
These reports suggest a pattern: DBInvesting allows losses but obstructs profitable withdrawals, citing arbitrary violations. Such practices undermine trust and highlight the risks of trading with offshore-regulated brokers.
The offshore registration combined with a U.S.-based server location adds complexity to jurisdictional accountability. Traders may struggle to determine which authority has oversight in case of disputes.

Pros:
Cons:
Compared to these brokers, DBInvesting's regulation appears weaker, relying on offshore oversight and limited advisory licenses. Competitors offer stronger compliance and investor protection.
DBInvesting regulation is fragmented across Seychelles, UAE, and Canada, with each license covering only part of its advertised services. The offshore FSA license provides minimal investor protection, while the UAE and Canadian authorizations exclude forex and derivatives trading. Verified offices exist only in Seychelles, and multiple user reports document withdrawal denials and erased profits.
For traders, the risks are clear: while DBInvesting offers competitive spreads, high leverage, and modern platforms, its regulatory standing is insufficient to guarantee safety. Competitors with Tier-1 oversight provide stronger safeguards.
Final Assessment: DBInvesting regulation is not robust enough to be considered safe. Traders should exercise extreme caution and consider alternatives with stronger compliance frameworks.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

TradingMoon operates under offshore regulation by Seychelles FSA. License SD042 covers forex and derivatives trading.

Does TrioMarkets’ entry into funded trading represent an opportunity or a risk? A new analysis reviews the business model, regulatory context, and broker evaluation on WikiFX before making a decision.

ehamarkets is the focus of many traders on broker review platforms for all the negative reasons. Among the many complaints against the Malaysia-based forex broker, the withdrawal issue and the utter helplessness of the trader in recovering their funds stood out. The broker is accused of denying traders their funds using numerous excuses. So, if you were planning to invest in this forex broker, do not miss reading this ehamarkets review article. Take a look!

Witnessed a complete halt on your Bull Market trading platform after a good run? Did you receive a poor response from the broker’s official upon the trading halt enquiry? Failed to receive withdrawals despite undergoing numerous checks by the forex broker? Is your Bull Market withdrawal application pending for months? Did you have to encounter massive trading fees on the Bull Market platform? These issues have become rampant here, and we have highlighted them in this Bull Market review article.