简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
RM80 Million in Losses After ‘Islamic’ Scheme Falls Apart
Abstract:A group of 232 investors is urging Malaysian authorities to launch a comprehensive investigation into an Islamic investment scheme that reportedly incurred losses exceeding RM80 million. The scheme, marketed under the guise of Islamic Redeemable Preference Shares (IRPS), is now under scrutiny for alleged misrepresentation and regulatory breaches.

More than 230 investors are asking authorities in Malaysia to investigate a company that ran what was claimed to be a Shariah-compliant investment scheme. The company is believed to have caused losses of at least RM80 million.
The Malaysian International Humanitarian Organisation (MHO) said the scheme looked legitimate at first. It used the name of a well-known Shariah adviser and appeared to follow Islamic financial principles. These factors gave many people confidence to invest.
MHO Secretary-General Datuk Hishamuddin Hashim said the company promoted Islamic Redeemable Preference Shares (IRPS) through marketing agents. The scheme was advertised as being in line with Islamic law. It had Shariah compliance certificates and submitted an official document, called an Information Memorandum (IM), to the Securities Commission Malaysia (SC).
Many investors believed that this meant the scheme was approved by the SC. However, this was not the case. Hishamuddin explained that submitting an IM does not mean the investment is approved, and that it is only allowed for “sophisticated investors”, that is for people with a net asset value of at least RM3 million and who invest a minimum of RM250,000.

In this case, many investors were ordinary people, not qualified under the law. Some invested as little as RM50,000, well below the legal threshold. This raises serious questions about whether the scheme was being offered in a way that broke the rules.
One of the agents who helped market the scheme, Datuk Seri Mahadi Badrul Zaman, said he too was a victim. He claimed to have lost more than RM20.7 million after investing in two of the involved companies.
Mahadi is also known for being the husband of actress Heliza Helmi. His name and his company, AUF MBZ Consortium Plt, were listed last year on the Securities Commission's investor alert list. The SC stated this was because of “unlicensed capital market activities” involving unlisted public company shares.
There is now growing pressure for regulators to take action. MHO wants a full investigation into the scheme, including the role of the Shariah adviser named in the documents. It also wants authorities to investigate whether false advertising and fraud were involved.
Hishamuddin said the case involves the public interest, as the victims include professionals from the oil and gas industry and well-known corporate figures. He urged the SC to open an official investigation and refer the case to the Attorney-Generals Chambers for possible charges.
Meanwhile, the controversy has gained attention on social media. Actress Fathia Latiff previously accused Mahadi of cheating her by failing to deliver a house she paid for five years ago.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

InterTrader Exposed: Traders Report Unfair Account Blocks, Profit Removal & Additional Fee for Withd
Does InterTrader block your forex trading account, giving inexplicable reasons? Does the broker flag you with latency trading and cancel all your profits? Do you have to pay additional fees for withdrawals? Did the UK-based forex broker fail to recognize the deposit you made? Does the customer service fail to address your trading queries? In this InterTrader review article, we have shared such complaints. Read them out.

Grand Capital Doesn’t Feel GRAND for Traders with Withdrawal Denials & Long Processing Times
The trading environment does not seem that rosy for traders at Grand Capital, a Seychelles-based forex broker. Traders’ requests for withdrawals are alleged to be in the review process for months, making them frustrated and helpless. Despite meeting the guidelines, traders find it hard to withdraw funds, as suggested by their complaints online. What’s also troubling traders are long processing times concerning Grand Capital withdrawals. In this Grand Capital review segment, we have shared some complaints for you to look at. Read on!

ADSS Review: Traders Say NO to Trading B’coz of Withdrawal Blocks, Account Freeze & Trade Issues
Does ADSS give you plenty of excuses to deny you access to withdrawals? Is your withdrawal request pending for months or years? Do you witness account freezes from the United Arab Emirates-based forex broker? Do you struggle to open and close your forex positions on the ADSS app? Does the customer support service fail to respond to your trading queries? All these issues have become a rage online. In this ADSS Broker review article, we have highlighted actual trader wordings on these issues. Keep reading!

INGOT Brokers Regulation 2025: ASIC vs Offshore License - What Traders Must Know
Explore INGOT Brokers regulation in 2025: Compare their ASIC and Seychelles FSA licenses, understand trader protection levels, and learn about potential risks in this detailed guide.
