WikiFX Spring Festival Message | Grounded in Transparency, Walking with Trust
As the Lunar New Year approaches, renewal is in the air. It is a moment to bid farewell to the old, welcome the new, and reflect while moving forward.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:ASIC cancels XTrade.AU's AFS license after findings of client exploitation and regulatory breaches, leaving the company under review by AAT.

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has canceled the Australian financial services (AFS) license of retail over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives issuer XTrade.AU Pty Ltd (XTrade) in a major regulatory move. The choice was made after an examination that turned up many cases of misbehavior, especially involving vulnerable individuals.
XTrade was found to have participated in a number of unethical activities during ASIC's June 2018–September 2022 examination. Some customers suffered significant losses as a result of the key findings, which included encouraging novice clients to trade in foreign exchange contracts (FX contracts) and contracts for difference (CFDs) despite their limited trading expertise and financial ability.
According to the regulating agency, XTrade has a history of unethical behavior by failing to fulfill its basic responsibilities as an AFS licensee. More precisely, XTrade did not do enough to guarantee that its agents followed the rules governing financial services. The business neglected to guarantee that the distribution of its retail products matched its target market determination and lacked appropriate procedures to handle conflicts of interest.
Furthermore, ASIC emphasized that XTrade did not behave in good faith and placed its own interests ahead of those of its customers, which was below the requirements of an AFS licensee. The study also found that XTrade had not given its agents enough training or taken any steps to stop them from misbehaving over a number of years.

ASIC's ruling was reviewed, and a stay was sought by XTrade with the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) on April 29, 2024. However the AAT rejected XTrade's stay motion at an interlocutory hearing on May 31, 2024; therefore, the AFS license is still revoked until the AAT decides on the substantive review case.
As a member of the global XTrade Group, XTrade has been licensed under AFS number 343628 since April 12, 2010. Leveraged derivative contracts, known as CFDs, the main product of the firm, let customers bet on changes in the value of underlying assets such as stock market indexes, specific stocks, commodities, and cryptocurrency assets.
The action by ASIC against XTrade is a component of a larger investigation into wrongdoing in the retail OTC derivatives industry. This involves taking legal action to shield customers from high-risk derivative products and collecting substantial fines from other companies. ASIC, for instance, obtained penalties of $75 million against AGM Markets and its authorized agents and $20 million against Forex Capital Trading Pty Limited.
Apart from the disciplinary procedures, ASIC has concentrated on regulatory initiatives meant to safeguard consumers. These include the CFD product intervention order (PIO) being implemented and extended to place limitations on CFDs given to retail consumers. This injunction, which was in force starting on March 29, 2021, has been extended until May 23, 2027, therefore lowering the possibility of serious injury to retail clientele.
ASIC's monitoring has also made it possible to pay out over $17.4 million in total compensation to more than 2,000 retail customers who were the victims of violations of financial services legislation by a number of retail OTC derivatives issuers. ASIC's September 6, 2023, Report 770 also highlights areas for improvement and summarizes the main findings on how issuers of retail OTC derivatives are fulfilling their design and distribution responsibilities.
Financial product issuers and distributors have responsibilities for design and distribution that call on them to make sure that products are made with the requirements of consumers in mind and delivered strategically. Furthermore, issuers have to keep an eye on results and periodically review their product governance structures.
ASIC's swift action against XTrade emphasizes the need to follow legal requirements and the consequences of neglecting to safeguard vulnerable customers in the financial services industry. While the AAT's review process is ongoing, consumers and industry stakeholders will be keenly watching the result.
Related news:

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

As the Lunar New Year approaches, renewal is in the air. It is a moment to bid farewell to the old, welcome the new, and reflect while moving forward.

XSpot Wealth has found many negative comments from traders who have allegedly been deceived by the broker. Traders constantly accuse the broker of causing unnecessary withdrawal blocks and forcing them to continue depositing with it. Many user complaints emerged on WikiFX, a leading global forex regulation inquiry app. In this XSpot Wealth review article, we have investigated multiple complaints against the broker. Read on!

Did SEVEN STAR FX make unreasonable verification requests and block your forex trading account later? Did the broker prevent you from accessing fund withdrawals? Were you made to wait for a long time to receive a response from the broker’s customer support official? Have you had to seek legal assistance to recover your stuck funds? Well, these are some claims made by SEVEN STAR FX’s traders. In this SEVEN STAR FX review article, we have looked closely at the company’s operation, the list of complaints, and a take on its regulatory status. Keep reading to know the same.

When traders search for "Is ZarVista Safe or Scam," they want to know if their capital will be safe. Nice features and bonuses do not matter much if you can't trust the broker. This article skips the marketing talk and looks at real evidence about ZarVista's reputation. We want to examine actual user reviews, look into the many ZarVista Complaints, and check the broker's legal status to get a clear picture. The evidence we found shows serious warning signs and a pattern of major user problems, especially about the safety and access to funds. This report gives you the information you need to make a smart decision about this risky broker.