简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
ThinkMarkets to Transfer $4.28M as Client Refunds
Abstract:London/Australia-based broker ThinkMarkets faces a court order to transfer $4.28 million into its UK client account following a legal dispute with a Turkish client, Abdurrahman Suzgun, accused of "swap abuse" and amidst the broker's recent financial challenges and cancelled merger plans.

ThinkMarkets, a Retail FX and CFDs broker headquartered in London and Australia, has been served with a court order from the Business and Property Courts of England and Wales – London Circuit Commercial Court. This court order, amounting to USD $4.28 million, is directed at both of ThinkMarkets operational entities, namely TF Global Markets (UK) Ltd and TF Global Markets (Aust) Pty Ltd. The interim mandatory injunction stipulates that ThinkMarkets must transfer the specified amount, $4,280,818.88, into its client money segregated account in the UK by 4:30 pm on Monday, January 15.
The issuance of this court order follows a legal dispute involving ThinkMarkets and a former client, Abdurrahman Suzgun, from Turkey. In late 2021, ThinkMarkets had communicated to Mr. Suzgun about the debiting of USD $4.28 million from his account, prompting the legal action taken by the aggrieved party against the broker.
Presiding over the matter, His Honour Judge Richard Pearce's order explicitly warns that failure to comply may lead to contempt of court, with potential consequences such as imprisonment, fines, or asset seizure for ThinkMarkets, its directors, or officers.

To provide context to the dispute, Abdurrahman Suzgun, a trader based in Turkey specializing in forex and precious metals, initiated a business relationship with ThinkMarkets UK in 2019. Ostensibly, the purpose was to hedge positions in his physical precious metals business. ThinkMarkets facilitated two accounts for Mr. Suzgun—a standard trading account and a Swap-Free Account, commonly offered by FX/CFD brokers for clients adhering to Islamic law, which prohibits interest charges.
In mid-2021, ThinkMarkets accused Mr. Suzgun of breaching the agreement by engaging in “swap abuse.” The broker contended that the Swap-Free Account was intended for exceptional circumstances and short-term positions, not for over 90% of trades carried for more than a day, as alleged by ThinkMarkets. The broker asserted potential earnings of over USD $1.6 million in Swap Charges if these trades had occurred in the regular account. Subsequently, ThinkMarkets debited $4.28 million labelled as “disputed funds” and an additional $370,000 classified as “undisputed funds” from Mr. Suzgun's account. The funds were transferred to ThinkMarkets Australia, the liquidity provider to ThinkMarkets UK.
Mr. Suzgun vehemently refuted ThinkMarkets' allegations, insisting that all trades adhered to the agreement's terms. Additionally, he claimed that, post-dispute, ThinkMarkets transferred his accounts to its Bermudan entity to evade FCA jurisdiction, despite his objections.
Although the UK courts are scheduled to hear the matter in February, the recent court order mandates ThinkMarkets to return the entire sum of “disputed funds” to its client money segregated account in the UK. This development follows ThinkMarkets' recent attempts to go public through a merger with FG Acquisition Corp. on the Toronto Stock Exchange. The deal, initially valued at approximately USD $160 million, was cancelled in December after FG's public shareholders opted for refunds, revealing ThinkMarkets' financial challenges and prompting auditors to issue a “going concern” warning.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Grand Capital Doesn’t Feel GRAND for Traders with Withdrawal Denials & Long Processing Times
The trading environment does not seem that rosy for traders at Grand Capital, a Seychelles-based forex broker. Traders’ requests for withdrawals are alleged to be in the review process for months, making them frustrated and helpless. Despite meeting the guidelines, traders find it hard to withdraw funds, as suggested by their complaints online. What’s also troubling traders are long processing times concerning Grand Capital withdrawals. In this Grand Capital review segment, we have shared some complaints for you to look at. Read on!

EmiraX Markets Withdrawal Issues Exposed
EmiraX Markets Review reveals unregulated status, fake license claims, and withdrawal issues. Stay safe and avoid this broker.

ADSS Review: Traders Say NO to Trading B’coz of Withdrawal Blocks, Account Freeze & Trade Issues
Does ADSS give you plenty of excuses to deny you access to withdrawals? Is your withdrawal request pending for months or years? Do you witness account freezes from the United Arab Emirates-based forex broker? Do you struggle to open and close your forex positions on the ADSS app? Does the customer support service fail to respond to your trading queries? All these issues have become a rage online. In this ADSS Broker review article, we have highlighted actual trader wordings on these issues. Keep reading!

INGOT Brokers Regulation 2025: ASIC vs Offshore License - What Traders Must Know
Explore INGOT Brokers regulation in 2025: Compare their ASIC and Seychelles FSA licenses, understand trader protection levels, and learn about potential risks in this detailed guide.
