简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
How Big Tech May Impact Financial Industry Competiton? FCA Wants to Know
Abstract:The FCA is waiting for views on possible harm and benefits from Big Tech companies. Responses can be provided by 15 January, 2023.

Big Tech firms may benefit consumers in the financial services industry but, in the longer term, could bring competition risks, according to the United Kingdom's Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). The regulatory watchdog launched a discussion on Tuesday on Big Tech companies' competition impact on the financial industry.
Take Advantage of the Biggest Financial Event in London. This year we have expanded to new verticals in Online Trading, Fintech, Digital Assets, Blockchain, and Payments.
According to the press release, the FCA is looking for responses by 15 January 2023. To start the discussion, it has published a report examining the potential competitive impacts of Big Tech firms in the UK in payments, consumer credit, insurance and deposit-taking sectors.
“In recent years, Big Tech's entry into financial services, in the UK and elsewhere, has demonstrated their potential to disrupt established markets, drive innovation and reduce costs for consumers. Across the world, we've seen the capability of Big Tech to offer transformative new products in areas such as payments, deposits and consumer credit,” Sheldon Mills, the Executive Director of Consumers and Competition at the FCA, said.
“The discussion we are starting today will inform the FCA's pro-competitive approach to digital markets, and I encourage consumers, firms, and fellow regulators to join the conversation.”
The United Kingdom's financial market watchdog believes that Big Tech companies can bring innovative offers, competitive pricing, healthy competition and increased efficiency to the local market. However, in the long term, the FCA identifies the potential risk of gaining too much market share too fast and exploiting market powers.
For now, any regulatory changes are not being proposed, and the goal of the current discussion paper is to stimulate a debate within the digital markets industry in the UK.
FCA Proactive Approach in 2021-2022
In the previous and the current year, the UK's financial markets regulator remains very active in many fields of its business. According to the fourth Consumer Investments Data Review published last week, the FCA opened 432 regulatory cases regarding potential cryptocurrency fraud and unaudited businesses between April 1, 2021, to April 31, 2022.
“More cases being referred to our crypto asset supervision team about potentially unregistered crypto asset businesses and potential scams, including through our improved detection of online promotions,” the FCA wrote in the newest report.
The same report presented a case study regarding the retail contracts for difference (CFDs) market, focusing on the companies that were operating under the UK's temporary permissions regime granted in 2021. The FCA found that 16 of them carried the hallmark of a potential scam and encouraged clients to 'trade excessively'. Ultimately, their operations were stopped.
The current proactive approach to enforcement activities is a part of the recently updated Consumer Investments Strategy. The strategy aims to help consumers make proper trading decisions and limit the number of overall trading scams.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

InterTrader Exposed: Traders Report Unfair Account Blocks, Profit Removal & Additional Fee for Withd
Does InterTrader block your forex trading account, giving inexplicable reasons? Does the broker flag you with latency trading and cancel all your profits? Do you have to pay additional fees for withdrawals? Did the UK-based forex broker fail to recognize the deposit you made? Does the customer service fail to address your trading queries? In this InterTrader review article, we have shared such complaints. Read them out.

Grand Capital Doesn’t Feel GRAND for Traders with Withdrawal Denials & Long Processing Times
The trading environment does not seem that rosy for traders at Grand Capital, a Seychelles-based forex broker. Traders’ requests for withdrawals are alleged to be in the review process for months, making them frustrated and helpless. Despite meeting the guidelines, traders find it hard to withdraw funds, as suggested by their complaints online. What’s also troubling traders are long processing times concerning Grand Capital withdrawals. In this Grand Capital review segment, we have shared some complaints for you to look at. Read on!

EmiraX Markets Withdrawal Issues Exposed
EmiraX Markets Review reveals unregulated status, fake license claims, and withdrawal issues. Stay safe and avoid this broker.

ADSS Review: Traders Say NO to Trading B’coz of Withdrawal Blocks, Account Freeze & Trade Issues
Does ADSS give you plenty of excuses to deny you access to withdrawals? Is your withdrawal request pending for months or years? Do you witness account freezes from the United Arab Emirates-based forex broker? Do you struggle to open and close your forex positions on the ADSS app? Does the customer support service fail to respond to your trading queries? All these issues have become a rage online. In this ADSS Broker review article, we have highlighted actual trader wordings on these issues. Keep reading!
