简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
WikiFX report: JP MARKETS OPERATED IN ‘ABSOLUTE CONFLICT’ WITH ITS CLIENTS
Abstract:An investigation into JP Markets has uncovered how the South African-based online forex broker has allegedly been trading against its clients and tampering with trading circumstances in order to drive down high earners' profitability while increasing the firm's.

An investigation into JP Markets has revealed how the South African-based online forex broker has apparently been operating in “absolute conflict” with its clients – trading against them and meddling with the trading conditions in a bid to drive down high earners‘ profitability and hike up the firm’s.
This according to papers filed by the Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) in the South Gauteng High Court on Tuesday.
The FSCA suspended JP Markets financial services provider (FSP) license in June and is now moving to liquidate the company.
In the papers, Kedibone Dikokwe – who heads up the business supervision division at the FSCA – said while the companys core business model involved operating under an FSP licence, it had “structured its dealings in such a manner that it trades with or against its clients, acting as the principal”.
“This means that JP Markets core operating model creates an absolute conflict with each one of its clients. For every loss that a client makes on a transaction, JP Markets makes an equal and corresponding profit”.
The investigation into JP Markets – which is still ongoing – came in response to a barrage of complaints from clients, mainly that the firm had failed to pay out or that they had suffered losses due to interrupted access to the platform.
Described on its website as a “global Forex powerhouse” and “South Africa and Africas largest Forex broker,” JP Markets was in 2016 issued with a category 1 license to – as Dikokwe explained – “provide advice and render intermediary services in respect of derivative instruments and deposits as defined in the Banks Act”.
But during the course of investigations, a different picture of the companys operations emerged.
“JP Markets offered their clients access to a platform to trade in CFDs (contracts for difference). Clients opened accounts and deposited funds into one of the bank accounts in the name of and under the full control of JP Markets. A deposit would then permit the client to trade in forex exchange CFDs to the extent of the deposited funds. Clients would enter transactions and make profits or make losses, as the underlying forex exchange moved up or down,” she said.
“However, the clients were not trading on an online decentralised global financial market; they were merely entering trades on a platform that was no more than an off-the-shelf software application that recorded these trades. In fact, clients were purchasing CFDs issued by JP Markets … JP Markets required an over-the-counter derivative provider licence to conduct these services lawfully.”
The investigations had further revealed a separate so-called “toxic” group – with different trading conditions – had been created for high earners, who were unknowingly moved there.
Pakistani resident Saad Sidat – who managed the platform – blew the lid when he was interviewed by investigators.
“According to Sidat, JP Markets would also get rid of some ‘toxic’ clients by refusing withdrawal requests as some of the clients unexpectedly still profited while trading in the ‘toxic’ group,” Dikokwe said.
When its license was suspended, JP Markets was barred from concluding any new business but, said Dikokwe, the company had not complied.
“The authority considers that the interests of JP Markets clients and members of the public require that the company be liquidated,” she said.
The urgent application is expected to be heard later this month. In the meantime, the FSCA said in a statement this week that JP Marketss bank accounts had been frozen.
JP Markets did not respond to a request for comment yesterday.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

WikiEXPO Global Expert Interviews: Gustavo Antonio Montero: ESG in Finance
As WikiEXPO Dubai concludes successfully, we had the pleasure of interviewing MR. Gustavo, the Chairman and Founder of Carter Capital Management. (Sustainable Digital Assets Management) and Palmer Advisory and Consulting. Palmer is a global business that develops advanced fintech/digital technology solutions and works with Blockchain technologies.

Fidelity Exposed: Traders Complain About Withdrawal Denials, Frozen Accounts & Platform Glitches
Does Fidelity Investments prevent you from accessing funds despite numerous assurances on your requests? Do you witness an account freeze by the US-based forex broker every time you request withdrawal access? Do you struggle with an unstable trading platform here? Is the slow Fidelity customer service making you face forced liquidation? These issues haunt traders, with many of them voicing their frustration on several broker review platforms such as WikiFX. In this Fidelity review article, we have shared quite a few complaints for you to look at. Read on!

Exposing The Trading Pit: Traders Blame the Broker for Unfair Withdrawal Denials & Account Blocks
Did you receive contradictory emails from The Trading Pit, with one approving payout and another rejecting it, citing trading rule violations? Did you purchase multiple trading accounts but receive a payout on only one of them? Did The Trading Pit prop firm refund you for the remaining accounts without clear reasoning? Did you face account bans despite using limited margins and keeping investment risks to a minimum? These are some raging complaints found under The Trading Pit review. We will share some of these complaints in this article. Take a look.

M&G Review: Traders Report Fund Scams, Misleading Market Info & False Return Promises
Applying for multiple withdrawals at M&G Investments but not getting it into your bank account? Do you see the uncredited withdrawal funds out of your forex trading account on the M&G login? Does the customer support service fail to address this trading issue? Does the misleading market information provided on this forex broker’s trading platform make you lose all your invested capital? Were you lured into investing under the promise of guaranteed forex returns? These issues have become highly common for traders at M&G Investments. In this M&G review article, we have echoed investor sentiments through their complaint screenshots. Take a look!
