Global Broker Regulation Inquiry App
WikiFX
English
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Apple defeats copyright lawsuit over racially diverse emoji
Abstract：Apple Inc convinced a California federal judge on Wednesday to throw out a lawsuit accusing the tech giant of ripping off another companys multiracial emoji and violating its intellectual property rights.
Cub Club Investment LLC didnt show that Apple copied anything that was eligible for copyright protection, U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria said.
Chhabria gave Cub Club a chance to amend its lawsuit but said he was “skeptical” it could succeed based on several differences between its emoji design and Apples.
Texas-based Cub Club‘s 2020 lawsuit said that its founder Katrina Parrott created and launched the “iDiversicons” app in 2013, calling it the world’s first emoji with diverse skin tones.
Cub Club said Parrott discussed a potential partnership with Apple representatives in 2014, and that Apple created its own set of multiracial emoji after declining to work with her. It said Apple‘s emoji infringed its copyrights and trademark rights, arguing they copied iDiversicons’ five skin tones and other features.
Chhabria said in a Wednesday order that even if the complaint was true, Apple at most copied Cub Clubs unprotectable “idea” of diverse emoji.
“There arent many ways that someone could implement this idea,” Chhabria said. “After all, there are only so many ways to draw a thumbs up.”
Cub Club only owns weak copyrights in the unique expressive aspects of its designs, and Apple‘s emojis weren’t similar enough to infringe them, Chhabria said, citing differences in their coloring, shapes, and other features.
Chhabria also found that Cub Club didnt have protectable trademark rights for its emoji.
Apple and attorneys for both companies did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
The case is Cub Club Investment LLC v. Apple Inc, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, No. 3:21-cv-06948.
For Cub Club: Todd Patterson of Patterson + Sheridan
For Apple: Andrew Gass of Latham & Watkins
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more
Seacrest Markets Exposed: Are You Facing Payout Denials and Spread Issues with This Prop Firm?
Seacrest Markets has garnered wrath from traders owing to a variety of reasons, including payout denials for traders winning trading challenges, high slippage causing losses, the lack of response from the customer support official to address withdrawal issues, and more. Irritated by these trading inefficiencies, a lot of traders have given a negative review of Seacrest Markets prop firm. In this article, we have shared some of them. Take a look!
Original 18h
GKFX Review: Are Traders Facing Slippage and Account Freeze Issues?
Witnessing capital losses despite tall investment return assurances by GKFX officials? Do these officials sound too difficult for you to judge, whether they offer real or fake advice? Do you encounter slippage issues causing a profit reduction on the GKFX login? Is account freezing usual at GKFX? Does the United Kingdom-based forex broker prevent you from accessing withdrawals? You are not alone! In this GKFX review guide, we have shared the complaints. Take a look!
Original 19h
Is Seaprimecapitals Regulated? A Complete Look at Its Safety and How It Works
The straightforward answer to this important question is no. Seaprimecapitals works as a broker without proper regulation. This fact is the most important thing any trader needs to know, because it creates serious risks for your capital and how safely the company operates. While this broker offers some good features, like the popular MetaTrader 5 platform and a low starting deposit, these benefits cannot make up for the major risks that come from having no real financial supervision. This article will give you a detailed, fact-based look at Seaprimecapitals regulation, what the company claims to do, the services it provides, and the clear differences between official information and user reviews. Our purpose is to give you the information you need to make a smart decision about the risks and benefits of working with this company.
Original 20h
Seaprimecapitals Review 2025: A Complete Look at an Unregulated Broker
Seaprimecapitals presents a common problem for today's traders: it offers easy-to-use features and low starting costs, but it lacks important financial regulation. When traders research this broker, it looks good at first glance with features such as a $10 minimum deposit and the popular MT5 trading platform. However, these features come without the investor protections that regulated brokers provide. This review gives you a complete and fair analysis based on available information to help you make a smart decision.
Original 21h
WikiFX Broker
Latest News
Interactive Brokers Expands Access to Taipei Exchange
WikiFXSimulated Trading Competition Experience Sharing
WikiFXWinproFx Regulation: A Complete Guide to Its Licensing and Safety for Traders
WikiFXAxi Review: A Data-Driven Analysis for Experienced Traders
WikiFXINZO Regulation and Risk Assessment: A Data-Driven Analysis for Traders
WikiFXPepperstone CEO: “Taking Down Scam Sites Almost Every Day” Becomes “Depressing Daily Business”
WikiFXThe CMIA Capital Partners Scam That Cost a Remisier Almost Half a Million
WikiFXIs Seaprimecapitals Regulated? A Complete Look at Its Safety and How It Works
WikiFXeToro Cash ISA Launch Shakes UK Savings Market
WikiFXCleveland Fed's Hammack supports keeping rates around current 'barely restrictive' level
WikiFXCurrency Calculator
USD
CNY
Current Rate: 0
Amount
USD
Available
CNY
Calculate